Hearsay (now part of Yext, and marketed as Hearsay Relate) is a compliance and marketing platform built around your advisors' existing communication channels — SMS, WhatsApp, voice, and social media. It captures, archives, and supervises what advisors send over those native networks, and integrates deeply with Salesforce to automate outreach at very large scale.
Qwil Messenger is a dedicated, encrypted client-communication app used by firms ranging from solo advisors to global asset managers and enterprise wealth teams. Instead of wrapping compliance around SMS or social channels, Qwil creates the channel itself — a single branded environment for chat, document sharing, e-signatures, video meetings, and scheduling — with the audit trail built into the infrastructure rather than layered on afterward.
Both platforms serve regulated financial services firms of real scale. The difference isn't firm size — it's whether your priority is making your advisors' existing broadcast and outreach channels (text, WhatsApp, social) compliant at volume, or running your highest-stakes, document-heavy client relationships through a single purpose-built, encrypted channel with nothing bolted on afterward.
Both platforms are genuinely enterprise-grade — this isn't a scale question. Qwil is used by everyone from independent RIAs to global private banks and asset managers, with dedicated Enterprise plans covering multi-region hosting, white-label SDK, and staff federation across large organisations.
Hearsay Systems was founded in 2009 and built its reputation helping large financial services and insurance organisations manage compliant social media, texting, and local advisor websites at scale. In 2018 it launched Hearsay Relate, a compliant texting product that lets advisors call and text clients from a dedicated business number, and in December 2019 it added automated compliance supervision — using pre-built keyword lexicons to flag risky language in real time rather than relying purely on manual review.
Hearsay's client base is genuinely enterprise-scale: it reports serving over 200,000 advisors and agents at firms including New York Life, Morgan Stanley, Charles Schwab, BlackRock, and Vanguard. In late 2024, Hearsay Systems was acquired by Yext, and its texting product now sits inside Yext's platform as Hearsay Relate (also referred to as Yext Relate).
Core to the Hearsay proposition is depth of CRM integration — particularly with Salesforce, where it automates contact capture, activity syncing, and outreach workflows — plus its supervision tooling: keyword lexicons, pre-approval workflows, and a compliance dashboard that lets firms manage large numbers of advisors from a single console.
What it doesn't include natively: end-to-end encrypted messaging, a branded client-facing app, built-in e-signatures, built-in video calling, or built-in secure document sharing at scale. These typically require separate tools sitting alongside Hearsay in an advisor's stack.
Qwil Messenger takes a different starting point. Rather than making an existing consumer channel — SMS, WhatsApp, or a social DM — compliant after the fact, Qwil builds the channel itself. Clients are invited into a firm's own branded, encrypted workspace, where every message, document, signature request, and video call happens inside the same environment and is captured automatically.
Qwil is ISO 27001 certified, supports GDPR and configurable data residency, and is used across financial services, wealth management, healthcare, legal, accounting, and real estate — anywhere a firm needs a verified, auditable channel with its clients.
This is the question that actually separates these two categories of platform, and it's worth being precise about it rather than reducing it to a marketing slogan.
Advisors communicate over SMS, WhatsApp, or social media — channels that were never designed with financial services recordkeeping or encryption in mind — and Hearsay's job is to capture what happens on those channels, apply lexicon-based supervision, and make the result available for compliance review. This is a well-established and genuinely useful model: it lets clients keep using the channels they already have open on their phone, and it gives compliance teams a supervision workflow across text and social in one dashboard.
The trade-off is structural, not a matter of execution. SMS is not encrypted in transit. Social platforms are third-party networks the firm doesn't control. Because the communication happens on the native channel first and is captured afterward, the completeness of the compliance record depends on the capture connector holding — if a connection between the messaging channel and the archive breaks, or a channel updates its API, there is a window where communication isn't captured at all. Regulators have been explicit about this risk: the SEC and FINRA have issued over $1.8 billion in fines for off-channel and improperly archived communications across the industry in recent years, and a meaningful share of those cases involve business communication that took place on channels — personal phones, unsanctioned apps, unsynced texting tools — that were assumed to be covered but weren't.
Because chat, documents, signatures, and video all happen inside Qwil's own infrastructure, every message and file is written directly into tamper-proof, non-erasable (WORM) storage the instant it's sent. There is no separate capture connector to fail, no third-party archiving integration to maintain, and no gap between "the message was sent" and "the message was recorded." Retention periods are configurable to FINRA's three-year minimum (or longer, where a firm's jurisdiction requires it), and a compliance team can search the full history by advisor, client, keyword, date, or document type through the same console — with one vendor accountable for both the communication channel and the archive.
Neither approach is universally "better" in the abstract — they answer different questions. Hearsay's model answers: "How do we make the channels our clients already use, compliant?" Qwil's model answers: "How do we build a channel that is compliant, secure, and unified by design, so there's nothing left to bolt on?"
For firms whose clients will only ever accept a text message, and whose regulatory exposure is limited to basic recordkeeping, an archived-native-channel approach like Hearsay's has genuine appeal. For firms handling sensitive documents, signatures, or higher-stakes conversations — or those who have been burned by a capture-connector gap during an examination — a platform where the archive is inseparable from the channel removes an entire category of risk.
Hearsay's biggest practical advantage is that clients don't need to do anything different. A text is a text; a WhatsApp message looks like every other WhatsApp message. For firms managing thousands of advisors and millions of end clients, that zero-friction adoption is a real asset, and it's a major reason Hearsay has scaled to the size it has.
The trade-off shows up once conversations move beyond a quick text. Sharing a sensitive document, requesting a signature, or hosting a video review typically means leaving the native channel entirely — into a separate secure portal, e-signature tool, or video platform — each one a new app, a new login, and, from a compliance perspective, another integration point that has to be individually maintained and verified.
Qwil asks clients to do one thing Hearsay doesn't: download an app (or use the web client) and verify their identity. In exchange, everything after that first step — messaging, documents, signatures, video, scheduling — happens in the same branded, encrypted space, with biometric login and no hunting across tools. For relationship-driven firms — wealth managers, RIAs, financial planners, private banks — that consolidated experience tends to translate into materially higher engagement than a text thread ever can, precisely because clients aren't repeatedly redirected out of the conversation to get things done.
Both platforms are used by regulated firms and both take FINRA, SEC, and equivalent obligations seriously — the difference is architectural, not a question of which vendor "cares more" about compliance.
Hearsay's supervision tooling — keyword lexicons, pre-approval workflows, real-time risk alerts — is purpose-built for firms that need to monitor very high volumes of advisor-generated content across text and social media, and its scale (200,000+ advisors) reflects genuine enterprise trust in that model. Its compliance strength lies in monitoring communications on channels the firm doesn't fully control.
Qwil's compliance strength lies in the fact that there is nothing to monitor after the fact, because the channel is the archive. Every conversation is ISO 27001-secured, encrypted end-to-end, and written to immutable storage the moment it's created — configurable to FINRA's retention requirements, GDPR, and HIPAA where relevant, with a Business Associate Agreement available for healthcare use cases. There's one vendor accountable for the entire chain, from message creation to searchable, exportable record.
Consider Hearsay if: Your firm operates at very large, distributed scale — thousands of advisors or agents — and your priority is bringing existing SMS, WhatsApp, and social media activity under compliant supervision without changing what channel clients see. You're heavily invested in Salesforce-driven marketing automation and social selling, and text messaging is one part of a broader digital engagement strategy rather than the centre of the client relationship.
Consider Qwil Messenger if: You want one platform — not a patchwork of texting, e-signature, video, and document-sharing tools — handling all client-facing communication with a single, immutable audit trail. You regularly share sensitive documents, request signatures, or need secure video conversations, and you want your firm's own brand front and centre rather than an unbranded text or social message. You're weighing where regulatory scrutiny is heading over the next several years, not just what satisfies today's minimum requirement, and you'd rather remove the capture-connector risk entirely than manage it.
The shift toward dedicated, purpose-built platforms isn't happening because archived SMS and social supervision stopped working — for many large field forces, it still does. It's happening because client expectations for security and experience have moved on, compliance scrutiny keeps intensifying, and the operational overhead of stitching together a messaging tool, an archiving connector, an e-signature app, and a video platform quietly costs more — in both risk and budget — than running one unified, compliant channel.
No. Hearsay's core channels — SMS, MMS, and social media — are native, non-encrypted channels. Hearsay's role is to capture, archive, and supervise what's sent over them, not to encrypt the transmission itself.
Yes. Qwil is configurable to FINRA Rule 4511, FINRA Rule 3110, and SEC Rule 17a-4, with WORM-compliant storage, configurable retention periods, and a dedicated Data Reviewer console for compliance teams.
No — clients are invited into your firm's branded Qwil workspace via the mobile app or web application at web.qwil.io, verified with two-factor authentication. Downloading the app is completely at the discretion of the end user, meaning they can choose to access Qwil in web or in app.
Not natively. Firms using Hearsay for texting typically pair it with separate e-signature and video conferencing tools, each requiring its own compliance and integration process.
Hearsay is built and priced for large, distributed enterprises with thousands of advisors. Qwil is designed to be deployed by independent advisors through to global asset managers alike, typically live within hours rather than requiring extended enterprise onboarding.